Price of water of Luoyang causes the dispute

Price of water of Luoyang causes the dispute
The Chinese resource products price reform was accelerated recently, the running water companies of Luoyang, Ningbo and other places demanded to be raised water price to query by people on the grounds of losing money one after another. Centre on water price cost topic, environmental Tsing-Hua University is expressed by water industry policy director of research center Fu Tao, the running water company is that " book suffers the loss, but the profit is not bad in fact " ,Because its profit has been shifted legally.Water price reforms and already raises the curtain at the end of last year, and it is constant to dispute on all the time. Even if is the water price hearing seeming to pay attention to procedure justice very much in some places, the image in the public visual field is not then front, because of these hearings, almost become taken as without exception finally " Listen to and rise the meeting " . In field of this kind of game, it is beaten in a contest feeling dejected that the public will be all scratched up each time.Such sad result, have in fact already set the tone. Some responsible institutions have never stopped reading and moving in the mouth " The upward space of water price is very large in the future " ,etc. spell,water affair enterprise not again two throat " lose money, large loss! " ,Then the price rises success will come after conditons are ripe. It is said, this kind " must rise in order to adjust " And the reason of an extraordinary coronet - -Compared with developed country, water price forms unreasonable and the water price is on the low side for a long time in our country, can't reflect rare intensity and water environmental improvement cost of the water resource accurately, the serious, water pollution can not be got after causing wasteful use of resources of water more indirectly. So, should be through raising water price, use the lever principle of the market to offset the above-mentioned negative effect.But this is actually a specious reason. First of all, ignore people's income gap, compare with the developed country with the price briefly, originally have comparativity, and, as the public products, its price must embody people's livelihood in government's responsibility meaning and ensure attribute with water resource. Moreover, as the existence necessities as air, food, residents' basic domestic consumption will not present the fluctuation as the price go up, rise in price, can not achieve obvious water-saving purpose simply, only can increase the intersection of life and cost of people and survive pressure." whether water wasteful use of resources quite serious and water pollution get control effectively " ,This one that is refracted more is circumstances of water for industrial use of the enterprise, and obviously have shade of government's common power non-performance inside. GDP worship and the intersection of market and superstition, cause many local government introduce " the high energy consumption, pollute again " blindly Big enterprise, great project. And for the short-term prominent achievements, some places do not hesitate to spoil these enterprises either, implement the policy, two-tier price system, reduce their operation cost by every possible means, will choose to look but see not too to its illegal blowdown. Hardly realize, this respect has formed the bad habit that these enterprises waste resources, the energy, cause the local ecology to pollute, on the other hand, can't overcome the cost and rise in the enterprises of the pressure and is competitiveless at all, can not become high-quality enterprises. In this case, why have the face, open one's mouth until " whether the intersection of water and the intersection of wasteful use of resources and serious, water pollution control " also Account,last price on the low side problem at water at?As to water affair enterprises " Lose money " Shout all over the sky,but also should screen we rationally. Lose money while being so-called, at least must have a transparent open operating cost of enterprise. Under the present linguistic context, the cost of these enterprises is only stored in a linguistic context mystified fuzzily and melted, there is no open but authoritative basis value as the reference system, the loss of capital of acting on one's own, do not obviously have convincingness. The industrial welfare of these resource enterprises that enjoy monopoly position, let general people admire very much endlessly.The similar water price adjusts this kind of resource price reform, it is undoubtedly the most important thing to give consideration to the people's livelihood. The adjustment of price is not a master key, ignore the people's livelihood and ensure readjusting the price of attribute, will only raise residents' life cost virtually. Let people in worry, the past two years, Chinese the intersection of water and the intersection of affair and market purchase several foreign capitals high premiums, until they publicize at purchasing domain insert the flag enclose place, on the formulation of water price, just have more words right, may monopolize water price directly. And their high premium of today will earn back both profit and capital tomorrow after purchasing. This cost will shift to consumers on the head finally, and as the property right passes into others' hands, the ability of regulation and control of price of the government will be faint day by day, even if want to give consideration to the people's livelihood, also will be unable to do what one wishes.So, the government can't remain indifferent to the capital and ride on a horse to enclose in the field of resource, the operation field is monopolized and aggravated, and must guarantee the people's livelihood of the public products ensures properties, can't unlock the property right of public resources blindly, and should unlock the power of management. Under guaranteeing the situation that the fundamental property of the public products does not change, let consumers enjoy good and inexpensive products and service in the sufficient market competition, but not leave people to accept what monopolized was practised usury in the name of market. Li XiaoLiang ( Chongqing Staff member)
|